Doctor Who and The Daleks
1965 Movie
By Terry Nation
Reviewed By Steven Harris
In late August
of 1965 Regal Films International released a movie based on Terry Nation’s BBC Doctor Who storyline, The Daleks, which had initially been
screened eighteen months earlier. The screenplay, adapted by Milton Subotsky
but remaining reasonably faithful to the original Nation script, showed an
entirely new crew for the Tardis zipping off across time and space to encounter
the already iconic metallic pepper-pots from Skaro.
In much the
same way that the 1967 version of Casino
Royale and Never Say Never Again (1983)
are not considered to be part of the James Bond canon, director Gordon
Flemyng’s forays into Dr. Who movies
are not incorporated into the history of the BBC television show or the
character of the Doctor himself. Whether the BBC had designs on a theatrical
release of their hugely successful science-fiction show, as some suggest, or
not is irrelevant: Terry Nation had created the Daleks and was perfectly within
his rights to wish to exploit the concept on the big screen. Some deal must
have been done, however, to allow Regal Films, a company more known for budget
horror nonsense, to use the Doctor’s name and the acronym TARDIS (the ship is
still a familiar blue police box which presumably was not copyrightable at that
time, even though the BBC did copyright the image once such devices were no
longer being manufactured or used by the British constabulary).
Peter Cushing
plays a human who is a doctor (of what we are not informed) and whose surname
is Who. Now I’m nitpicking I know and to the ear Doctor Who and Dr. Who sound
exactly the same but the principle facet of the character is entirely altered with
such syntactical sleight of hand. Basically the character as a human is all
wrong (don’t get me started on the ‘half human’ claim of Paul McGann’s Doctor,
which is considered canonical). Right
from the off, then, this is a watered-down time-traveller, suitably served therefore
by a gaudy, brass-heavy soundtrack and incidental music which could not be
further from the world of the BBC radiophonic department’s effects for the
television show.
Further changes
to the group dynamic follow but are less impactive than the alteration to the
main character. Susan, played by Roberta Tovey, is still his granddaughter but
she is a much younger girl. Barbara (Jennie Linden) is Susan’s older sister and
Ian is Barbara’s boyfriend played with unnecessary slapstick overtones by Roy Castle.
Castle’s mugging and pratfalls often serve to distance the audience from the
action and frequently interrupt the dramatic flow.
Once the gang
are all assembled in Tardis (not ‘the Tardis’ apparently which actually makes
more grammatical sense, a rare logical improvement on the TV show) the plot
follows pretty much the same lines as the William Hartnell adventure which
Terry Nation had written almost two years earlier. The pacing is quicker,
however, less need for filler in amongst the expositional dialogue as the
entire adventure lasts for less than an hour and a half onscreen whereas the
original had covered seven 25 minute episodes. The Daleks themselves are
shinier and have the added advantage of being in colour. Once this novelty has
worn off, however, they seem somehow less menacing than their television
counterparts even though the voices were provided by Peter Hawkins and David
Graham, just as they were for Hartnell’s Doctor. Perhaps it is the absence of
the word ‘exterminate’. Perhaps it is the fault of the so-called light relief
offered up by Roy Castle. Whatever the reason, these tin monsters come across
more as stroppy toddlers than as the demonic, xenophobic villains they ought to
be.
The history of
how the Daleks came to be mutated and encased in their mobile units is all
there, told both by the Daleks themselves and by the Thals who are descended
from those against whom a neutronic war had been waged. The crux of the story
is the fact that the Thals have concocted various drugs which combat the
effects of the planet’s still highly radioactive atmosphere. When the Daleks
learn of this they are determined to obtain some of the drug and replicate it
for their own use so that they can leave their machines and their city behind,
presumably to go killing and conquering across the face of the planet once
more.
The contrast
between the monotone, angry Daleks and the beatific, even angelic Thals plays
on a science-fiction trope that goes at least back as far as the Eloi and the
Morlocks from H.G Wells’s classic The
Time Machine (1895). It also builds on more recent realities with the
Daleks standing for the eugenically-obsessed Nazis during the 1930s and 40s. Yet
the plot, so atmospherically played out in black and white on the small screen,
does not translate so well to cinematic colour and scale. The dialogue is often
too rushed, the sets look fairly cheap although there is a great back-painting
of the surface of Skaro and a distant moon at one stage. While a 1960s TV
audience might accept that an alien planet resembles nothing so much as the
interior of a Shepperton television studio, the same effect at the cinema
lessens the impact. I would assume that the greatest expenses on the shoot were
Cushing’s fee and the cost of the Thals’ make-up which was caked on in a manner
the teenagers of the 70s would themselves adopt in homage to another beatific
alien: David Bowie.
When the Daleks
realise that they have become too mutated for the anti-radiation drug to enable
them to return to a more humanoid form they have a full-on tantrum and decide
that they’ll just bomb the crap out of Skaro instead in order to remain the
only living species able to survive. The ordinarily peaceful Thals are
persuaded to fight the Daleks in order to protect their own future by a bit of
psychological manipulation which worked quite well for Hartnell but which seems
hurried and unconvincing here. A last battle ensues, the Daleks’ spiteful plan
is thwarted and everyone is happy. Except the Daleks, obviously, but they are
never happy. Shouty, shooty, exterminatey – yes. Happy – no.
The movie must
have done reasonably well at the box office as a sequel was commissioned and
released the following year but in terms of the world of Doctor (not Dr.) Who,
both films are an addendum, a trivial footnote and an early lesson to movie
makers that successful TV shows do not necessarily make for successful film
formats (a lesson the makers of films such as Miami Vice, Scooby Doo, George & Mildred and countless other
abominations really should have heeded).
I do not know
whether Matt Smith has ever watched the Cushing films but there is a similarity
in the gait of Cushing’s Dr. and Smith’s 11th Doctor. Smith is
naturally slightly bandy, Cushing was, I believe, assuming a quirk in his
characterisation. The bow-legged stance is a minor familiarity that merely
reminds me that the show continues to be best served by television. By all
means grab yourself a BluRay copy – the extras will no doubt be interesting and
completists can die safe in the knowledge that they gathered everything vaguely
Whovian that is on the market. Just don’t expect to be wowed by effects, acting
or by the impact of a largely pointless attempt to carve the good Doctor’s
legend onto the big screen.
good posting of latest-50th-anniversary-wishes
ReplyDelete